Abstract

In this paper we study a family of variance reduction methods with randomized batch size—at each step, the algorithm first randomly chooses the batch size and then selects a batch of samples to conduct a variance-reduced stochastic update. We give the linear convergence rate for this framework for composite functions, and show that the optimal strategy to achieve the optimal convergence rate per data access is to always choose batch size of 1, which is equivalent to the SAGA algorithm. However, due to the presence of cache/disk IO effect in computer architecture, the number of data access cannot reflect the running time because of 1) random memory access is much slower than sequential access, 2) when data is too big to fit into memory, disk seeking takes even longer time. After taking these into account, choosing batch size of 1 is no longer optimal, so we propose a new algorithm called SAGA++ and show how to calculate the optimal average batch size theoretically. Our algorithm outperforms SAGA and other existing batched and stochastic solvers on real datasets. In addition, we also conduct a precise analysis to compare different update rules for variance reduction methods, showing that SAGA++ converges faster than SVRG in theory.