Abstract
When one wants to draw non-trivial inferences
from an inconsistent belief base, a very natural approach is to take advantage of the maximal consistent subsets of the base. But few inference relations from maximal consistent subsets exist. In this
paper we point out new inference relations based
on selection of some maximal consistent subsets,
leading thus to inference relations with a stronger
inferential power. The selection process must obey
some principles to ensure that it leads to an inference relation which is rational. We define a general
class of monotonic selection relations for comparing maximal consistent subsets and show that it corresponds to the class of rational inference relations