资源论文Seeing is Worse than Believing: Reading People’s Minds Better than Computer-Vision Methods Recognize Actions

Seeing is Worse than Believing: Reading People’s Minds Better than Computer-Vision Methods Recognize Actions

2020-04-07 | |  52 |   36 |   0

Abstract

We had human sub jects perform a one-out-of-six class action recognition task from video stimuli while undergoing functional mag- netic resonance imaging (fMRI). Support-vector machines (SVMs) were trained on the recovered brain scans to classify actions observed during imaging, yielding average classification accuracy of 69.73% when tested on scans from the same sub ject and of 34.80% when tested on scans from different sub jects. An apples-to-apples comparison was performed with all publicly available software that implements state-of-the-art ac- tion recognition on the same video corpus with the same cross-validation regimen and same partitioning into training and test sets, yielding clas- sification accuracies between 31.25% and 52.34%. This indicates that one can read people’s minds better than state-of-the-art computer-vision methods can perform action recognition.

上一篇:Joint Cascade Face Detection and Alignment

下一篇:Af fine Subspace Representation for Feature Description

用户评价
全部评价

热门资源

  • Learning to Predi...

    Much of model-based reinforcement learning invo...

  • Stratified Strate...

    In this paper we introduce Stratified Strategy ...

  • The Variational S...

    Unlike traditional images which do not offer in...

  • A Mathematical Mo...

    Direct democracy, where each voter casts one vo...

  • Rating-Boosted La...

    The performance of a recommendation system reli...