资源分类
》 资源 》论文》revisiting unrestricted rebut and preferences in structured argumentation

revisiting unrestricted rebut and preferences in structured argumentation

2019-11-01 | |  42 |   47 |   0
Abstract In structured argumentation frameworks such as ASPIC+ , rebuts are only allowed in conclusions produced by defeasible rules. This has been criticized as counter-intuitive especially in dialectical contexts. In this paper we show that ASPIC? , a system allowing for unrestricted rebuts, suffers from contamination problems. We remedy this shortcoming by generalizing the attack rule of unrestricted rebut. Our resulting system satisfies the usual rationality postulates for prioritized rule bases.

上一篇：recognizing top monotonic preference profiles in polynomial time

下一篇：posted pricing sans discrimination

用户评价
全部评价

热门资源

  • Learning to Predi...

    Much of model-based reinforcement learning invo...

  • Stratified Strate...

    In this paper we introduce Stratified Strategy ...

  • The Variational S...

    Unlike traditional images which do not offer in...

  • Learning to learn...

    The move from hand-designed features to learned...

  • A Mathematical Mo...

    Direct democracy, where each voter casts one vo...