资源论文Probabilistic Bipolar Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Complexity Results Bettina Fazzinga1 and Sergio Flesca2 and Filippo Furfaro2

Probabilistic Bipolar Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Complexity Results Bettina Fazzinga1 and Sergio Flesca2 and Filippo Furfaro2

2019-11-05 | |  58 |   55 |   0
Abstract Frameworks (prBAFs) are considered, and the complexity of the fundamental problem of computing extensions’ probabilities is addressed. The most popular semantics of supports and extensions are considered, as well as different paradigms for defining the probabilistic encoding of the uncertainty. Interestingly, the presence of supports, which does not alter the complexity of verifying extensions in the deterministic case, is shown to introduce a new source of complexity in some probabilistic settings, for which tractable cases are also identified.

上一篇:A Study of Argumentative Characterisations of Preferred Subtheories Marcello D’Agostino1 and Sanjay Modgil2

下一篇:From Conjunctive Queries to Instance Queries in Ontology-Mediated Querying

用户评价
全部评价

热门资源

  • Learning to Predi...

    Much of model-based reinforcement learning invo...

  • Stratified Strate...

    In this paper we introduce Stratified Strategy ...

  • The Variational S...

    Unlike traditional images which do not offer in...

  • A Mathematical Mo...

    Direct democracy, where each voter casts one vo...

  • Rating-Boosted La...

    The performance of a recommendation system reli...