资源分类
》 资源 》论文》Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: Axioms and Semantics Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim

Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: Axioms and Semantics Leila Amgoud and Jonathan Ben-Naim

2019-11-07 | |  63 |   45 |   0
Abstract The paper studies how arguments can be evaluated in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., graphs whose arguments have basic weights and may be supported and attacked). It introduces principles that an evaluation method (or semantics) would satisfy, analyzes existing semantics with respect to them, and finally proposes a new semantics for the class of non-maximal acyclic graphs.1

上一篇：Towards Reading Comprehension for Long Documents

下一篇：A Unifying View of Geometry, Semantics, and Data Association in SLAM?

用户评价
全部评价

热门资源

  • Learning to Predi...

    Much of model-based reinforcement learning invo...

  • Stratified Strate...

    In this paper we introduce Stratified Strategy ...

  • The Variational S...

    Unlike traditional images which do not offer in...

  • A Mathematical Mo...

    Direct democracy, where each voter casts one vo...

  • Rating-Boosted La...

    The performance of a recommendation system reli...