Dialectical Abstract Argumentation: A Characterization of the Marking Criterion
| 
62 | 
46 | 
0
Abstract This article falls within the fifield of abstract argumentation frameworks. In particular, we focus on the study of frameworks using a proof procedure based on dialectical trees. These trees rely on a marking procedure to determine the warrant status of their root argument. Thus, our objective is to formulate rationality postulates to characterize the marking criterion over dialectical trees. The behavior of the marking procedure is closely tied to the alteration of trees, which is the keystone of any model of change based on dialectical argumentation. Hence, the results achieved in this work will benefifit research on dynamics in argumentation
还没有评论，说两句吧！
热门资源
Learning to Predi...
Much of model-based reinforcement learning invo...
Stratified Strate...
In this paper we introduce Stratified Strategy ...
The Variational S...
Unlike traditional images which do not offer in...
A Mathematical Mo...
Direct democracy, where each voter casts one vo...
Rating-Boosted La...
The performance of a recommendation system reli...
智能在线
400-630-6780
聆听.建议反馈
E-mail: support@tusaishared.com
资源分类
